With limited time and resources, affiliate marketers must make calculated choices about where to focus their efforts—whether they’re managing a portfolio of niche sites or multiple content sections within a single authority site.
The challenge is familiar to every affiliate marketer: some content areas drive traffic but struggle with conversions, while others convert well but reach too few visitors. Some newer initiatives show promise but demand significant resources, while established content quietly generates reliable income.
Traditional marketing frameworks offer valuable perspectives that can bring clarity to these decisions. Among these frameworks, the Boston Consulting Group Matrix (BCGM) stands out as a particularly relevant tool for affiliate marketers seeking to optimize their digital assets and maximize commission revenue.
I built a rudimentary framework as far back as 2008 (published on Moz) and have refined it since and have been using it to advise affiliates over the last 15 years.
Developed by Bruce Henderson for the Boston Consulting Group in 1970, the Growth-Share Matrix (its formal name) was initially designed to help corporations manage their business units and product lines. Henderson recognized that companies needed a systematic approach to allocate resources across diverse business operations.
The genius of the BCG Matrix lies in its simplicity. By focusing on just two variables—market growth and market share—it creates a clear framework for strategic decision-making. This approach allows organizations to visualize their entire portfolio at once, identifying which products deserve investment and which might need reconsideration.
The matrix divides products or business units into four categories:
Each category suggests a different strategic approach, from investment and growth to harvesting or divesting. The framework’s enduring value comes from forcing strategic choices based on objective measurements rather than emotional attachments to particular products or initiatives.
While the original framework focused on traditional business units, the BCG Matrix translates remarkably well to affiliate marketing contexts. For affiliate marketers, individual websites in a portfolio or distinct content sections within a larger site can be plotted on this matrix to guide resource allocation decisions.
In the affiliate marketing realm, we can adapt the traditional axes:
Market Growth becomes Traffic Growth Rate: How quickly is traffic increasing to this affiliate site or content section?
Market Share becomes Commission Generation: How effectively does this site or content section convert visitors into affiliate commission revenue?
This adaptation maintains the spirit of the original framework while making it directly applicable to affiliate marketing decisions. If we were to outlay the sites in a portfolio, it could look something like this:
Whether you’re managing multiple niche sites or comparing different product categories within a single authority site, this framework provides clarity. Let’s explore each quadrant in detail:
Stars represent your most promising affiliate sites or content sections. These assets are experiencing rapid traffic growth while simultaneously generating substantial commission revenue. They combine momentum with monetization—a powerful combination that merits continued investment.
Real-World Example: Consider an affiliate site’s home office equipment section that has seen a 180% increase in organic traffic over the past year while simultaneously achieving a 12% affiliate click-through rate and strong conversion rates with merchants. The content is resonating with audience purchase intent and effectively moving visitors toward merchant purchases.
Strategic Approach for Affiliate Marketers: Stars require continued investment to maintain their growth trajectory. This might mean:
Key Insight for Affiliates: Stars offer valuable lessons about what’s working in your overall strategy. Analyze them deeply to understand patterns that might be replicated across other sites or content sections. Which types of products convert best? What price points drive the most commission? Which merchants offer the best combination of conversion rate and commission percentage? How can these insights guide your content development elsewhere?
Cash cows represent the stalwarts of your affiliate portfolio. While they may not be experiencing dramatic traffic growth, these sites or content sections consistently generate significant commission revenue with minimal ongoing investment. They’ve achieved a level of stability that makes them reliable income producers.
Real-World Example: An affiliate site focusing on camera equipment reviews that ranks well for valuable buying-intent keywords and generates consistent commission revenue. Traffic has plateaued at about 30,000 monthly visitors, but the 8% click-through rate to merchants and strong average order value create a dependable income stream with only occasional content updates required.
Strategic Approach for Affiliate Marketers: Cash cows should be maintained efficiently to preserve their commission-generating capacity:
Key Insight for Affiliates: Cash cows provide the financial foundation that enables experimentation elsewhere. These stable earners allow you to weather algorithm updates or merchant program changes while pursuing growth initiatives. Look for ways to systematize their maintenance, perhaps through virtual assistants who can regularly check for broken links or outdated information.
Question marks (sometimes called “problem children”) present interesting dilemmas for affiliate marketers. These sites or content sections show promising traffic growth but haven’t yet translated that audience into significant commission revenue. They represent potential that hasn’t been fully realized.
Real-World Example: A fitness equipment affiliate site that has rapidly gained traffic through informational content about home workouts but struggles with affiliate conversion. Despite attracting 50,000 monthly visitors, the site generates minimal commission income because visitors consume the workout information but rarely click through to purchase the recommended equipment.
Strategic Approach for Affiliate Marketers: Question marks require careful analysis and strategic decisions:
Key Insight for Affiliates: Question marks often suffer from a misalignment between content type and commercial intent. The audience may be valuable but at the wrong stage in their buying journey. By creating content that naturally bridges from information to purchase consideration (such as “What to look for when buying…” guides), you can often transform these traffic-rich assets into revenue generators.
Dogs represent the underperformers in your affiliate portfolio. These sites or content sections show minimal traffic growth and generate little commission revenue, raising questions about their continued value to your overall strategy.
Real-World Example: An affiliate site focused on smart home technology that has failed to gain traction despite considerable content investment. After eighteen months, the site attracts fewer than 100 daily visitors and has generated less than $200 in total affiliate commissions, yet still requires domain renewal, hosting costs, and occasional content updates.
Strategic Approach for Affiliate Marketers: Dogs demand honest assessment and decisive action:
Key Insight for Affiliates: The emotional attachment to affiliate sites can be surprisingly strong, especially if you’ve invested significant time creating content. However, recognizing and addressing underperforming assets is crucial for portfolio health. Every hour spent updating a “dog” site is an hour not spent on a potential “star.” Sometimes selling these sites on marketplaces like Flippa or Empire Flippers—even at a modest price—is better than continued investment in a losing proposition.
Implementing the BCG Matrix approach for your affiliate sites or content sections involves several key steps tailored to the affiliate marketing model:
Begin by gathering performance data across your affiliate properties. Focus on metrics that matter specifically to affiliate marketing:
For affiliate marketers using a single site with multiple content sections, segment your analytics data by content category or product type to enable meaningful comparisons.
Create a visual representation of your affiliate portfolio by plotting each site or content section on the matrix. For the two axes:
Consider adding visual elements to represent:
This visualization quickly reveals where your affiliate efforts are succeeding or struggling in a way that raw data might obscure.
With your matrix complete, assess each quadrant to develop appropriate affiliate strategies:
For Stars (High Growth, High Commission):
For Cash Cows (Low Growth, High Commission):
For Question Marks (High Growth, Low Commission):
For Dogs (Low Growth, Low Commission):
Transform your analysis into concrete action plans tailored to affiliate marketing:
Content Calendar Adjustments:
Affiliate Program Management:
Revisit your matrix quarterly to track changes and adjust strategies accordingly. The affiliate landscape changes rapidly with new products, commission structure changes, and search algorithm updates.
While the standard BCG Matrix provides valuable insights, affiliate marketers can enhance its utility through several advanced applications tailored to their business model:
Create separate matrices for each major affiliate merchant or network you work with. This merchant-level view reveals important patterns:
This analysis helps identify whether performance issues stem from your content approach or the merchants themselves, guiding decisions about which affiliate relationships to prioritize.
Develop a matrix that segments your affiliate content by product price points rather than by site or section:
This view often reveals surprising patterns about which price categories deliver the best commission returns relative to traffic, helping you focus future content development on the most profitable segments.
Enhance your matrix by color-coding or adding symbols to represent different affiliate terms:
This enhanced view helps identify whether high-performing sections succeed because of superior content or more favorable affiliate terms, informing both content and partnership strategies.
For affiliates in seasonal niches (like holiday gifts, summer products, or back-to-school items), create matrices for different seasonal periods:
This comparison reveals which content areas maintain value throughout the year versus those that spike during specific periods, helping you develop a more balanced content strategy that provides consistent income.
Develop matrices that segment your affiliate content by primary traffic source:
This view often reveals that certain traffic sources convert dramatically better for affiliate offers, helping you align your traffic acquisition strategy with your most profitable conversion paths.
While powerful, the BCG Matrix approach comes with potential pitfalls that digital marketers should avoid:
Question Marks often represent new initiatives that haven’t had sufficient time to establish monetization patterns. Giving up too quickly on promising traffic generators can mean missing future Stars. Consider setting longer evaluation timelines for properties showing strong audience growth.
Many digital marketers develop emotional connections to early projects or creative initiatives, leading to continued investment despite poor performance. The framework’s value comes from counterbalancing this tendency with objective performance metrics.
Not all traffic is equal in quality or conversion potential. A property might show modest traffic growth but attract highly qualified visitors with strong purchase intent. Supplement the quantitative matrix with qualitative audience analysis to avoid overlooking valuable niche properties.
The matrix captures current performance but doesn’t inherently account for future market potential. A property might currently sit in the Dog quadrant but address an emerging market with significant future potential. Consider adding a “market potential” overlay to your matrix for more forward-looking decisions.
The BCG Matrix offers affiliate marketers a powerful framework for making difficult but necessary strategic decisions. Whether you’re managing multiple affiliate sites or diverse content sections within a larger site, this approach cuts through emotional attachments and subjective impressions to reveal where your true opportunities lie.
For affiliate marketers looking to implement this approach:
In an affiliate space increasingly dominated by authority sites and sophisticated competition, strategic portfolio management becomes a critical differentiator. The most successful affiliate marketers aren’t necessarily those who create the most content or promote the most products—they’re those who strategically concentrate their efforts where the return on investment is highest.
By applying the BCG Matrix to your affiliate marketing efforts, you transform from a tactical content creator into a strategic portfolio manager. This mindset shift enables more efficient resource allocation, higher commission revenue, and ultimately, a more sustainable and profitable affiliate business.